Trump's oil price fakeUS crude export fell under President Biden by 40%, most probably due to decrease in demand by foreign partners. This is logically leading to a decrease of the crude price. Even though reasons for a lower consumption are mainly positioned abroad, further impact of erratic & invasive US politics under the following Trump administration can be expected. As global crude prices are usually hovering near 100 $ per barrel, it is not surprising that such prices had been slightly higher under the predictable rule of Obama & Biden, but didn't pose much of a problem for US consumers while the overall economy was running more quietly without Trump. However, after the US war on Iran started under president Trump, that decrease in demand of US oil has even reached 50%. Since the blockade of Hormuz and some military disturbances effecting Saudi oil production, its transportation via pipeline & Red Sea shipping, an additional factor heavily influenced global prices for crude oil: Increasing shipping costs that are distorting the market, and which are differing according to the length of shipping routes. For that I prepared another separate information link. From there, any decrease of crude oil prices cannot be necessarily related to the genius of US president Trump. As geopolitics still matter, it is clear that all kinds of erupting military conflicts and other political disturbances like trade wars are leaving their imprint on the history of crude price development. From time to time, oil extracting countries, united in the OPEC organisation, have to intervene by cutting their production quotes in order to stabilize global crude price:
China's lever on US soybean exportSoybeans are one of US biggest agricultural exports, and China is the most important buyer. The US exported $16.5 billion worth of soybeans last year, making soybeans the second-largest agricultural export after corn, according to the US Department of Agriculture. China buys more soybeans than every other country because it has limited arable land. That dependence has made soybeans vulnerable to swings in US-China trade policy. In the years before the first Trump trade war in 2018, America's Soybean Association estimated 28% of all US soybean production was shipped to China. When Beijing then imposed a 25% retaliatory tariff on US soybeans in 2018, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimated farmers absorbed $9.4 billion in soybean losses, costing Iowa $1.2 billion and Illinois $1.3 billion. That helps explain why Trump focused on soybeans in his dealmaking with Beijing. In November, he struck a deal with Xi under which China committed to buying at least 25 million metric tons of soybeans in 2026, 2027, and 2028. After he met Xi in May, the first time a US president visited China since 2017, the White House announced China agreed to buy at least $17 billion in agri- cultural products on top of those prior soybean commitments. But China has options ... For all of soybeans importance to American farmers, China has a 2nd supplier: Brazil, a member of the China led commercial alliance of nations BRICS. Brazil had already overtaken the US as China s largest soybean supplier over a decade ago, but recent trade tensions have widened the gap. USDA said that 71% of China s soybean imports came from Brazil, and its agricultural attaché in Beijing reported last year that Brazil s share had continued to grow at the expense of the United States which was helped by cheaper prices. So China left the door half-closed. [Fortune, September 28, 2026] |
Donald - Who are You ?
|